State v. Melendez

As a friend-of-the-court, the ACLU-NJ argued that Hudson County violated Luis Melendez's rights when they used his statements from a civil asset forfeiture case as evidence against him in his subsequent criminal trial. It is unconstitutional, the ACLU-NJ asserted, to force people like Mr. Melendez to choose between their right against self-incrimination and their right to be accorded due process before the State may permanently deprive them of their property. Here, Mr. Melendez was warned that if he did not respond to the State’s civil asset forfeiture suit, he could lose the nearly $3,000 the police had seized from him based on a suspicion that it was involved in criminal activity. Mr. Melendez, who did not have a lawyer, wasn’t aware that the information he shared in the process of challenging that forfeiture could be admitted in the State’s criminal case against him. The ACLU-NJ argued that Mr. Melendez’s uncounseled statement should have been excluded from the State’s criminal case and offered recommendations for procedural protections in these circumstances.

Status

ACLU-NJ argued the cause before the New Jersey Supreme Court on October 24, 2017. A decision is pending.

Related Content

Stay Informed

Join the Action Alert e-mail list to stay informed about current issues and campaigns, upcoming events, and how you can get more involved in the fight to protect and expand civil liberties.

ACLU of New Jersey is part of a
network of affiliates

Learn more about ACLU National

secret