Court Cases

Amicus brief arguing that a categorical rule requiring a defendant to present expert testimony in order to raise an insanity defense is unconstitutional.

Amicus brief arguing that a categorical rule requiring a defendant to present expert testimony in order to raise a diminished capacity defense is unconstitutional.

Amicus brief arguing the prosecutor's misconduct in her opening and closing statements significantly prejudiced the defendant.

Amicus brief arguing that the state needs expert witnesses to explain to juries the limits of using cell phone towers to locate suspects at crime scenes.

Amicus brief arguing in support of policies creating learning environments free from discrimination and harassment by respecting transgender students’ preferred names and pronouns.

Complaint filed on behalf of Rutgers students who had their F-1 student immigration status effectively terminated.

Amicus brief arguing for disclosure under OPRA of identity of private practice attorney who provided legal advice to municipal prosecutor.

Amicus brief arguing that the retroactive application of 1997 amendments to the parole statute to a person who committed his crime prior to the amendments amounts to an ex post facto violation.

Amicus brief arguing against overbroad search warrants as they pertain to cell phone data.