State v. Green

As a friend-of-the-court, the ACLU-NJ, the Innocence Project and the Innocence Network argued that when law enforcement utilizes databases that house electronic mugshots, it must adequately record the identification procedures. The brief, authored by Gibbons P.C., argues that the plain language of R. 3:11, and also the history, science, and policy that underlie New Jersey’s robust case law addressing eyewitness identification, support such a requirement. Additionally, because of the grave risk of misidentification, the brief contends that suppression is the proper remedy where law enforcement fails to preserve photos from an array constructed using the database.

Status

The case is pending argument.

Related Content

Stay Informed

Join the Action Alert e-mail list to stay informed about current issues and campaigns, upcoming events, and how you can get more involved in the fight to protect and expand civil liberties.

ACLU of New Jersey is part of a
network of affiliates

Learn more about ACLU National

secret